Planning Committee (including Former Development Management And Development Quality) - 08/11/2021

At a MEETING of the PLANNING COMMITTEE held remotely on 8th November, 2021.

 

Present:-

 

Lord Provost Ian BORTHWICK

 

BAILIES

 

Willie SAWERS

Kevin KEENAN

Derek J SCOTT

Christina ROBERTS

Fraser MACPHERSON

Helen WRIGHT

 

COUNCILLORS

 

John ALEXANDER

Anne RENDALL

Charlie MALONE

Kevin CORDELL

Steven ROME

Margaret RICHARDSON

Will DAWSON

Roisin SMITH

Donald HAY

Mark FLYNN

Georgia CRUICKSHANK

Philip SCOTT

Stewart HUNTER

Richard McCREADY

Craig DUNCAN

Ken LYNN

George McIRVINE

Gregor MURRAY

 

Councillor Will DAWSON, Convener, in the Chair.

 

The minute of meeting of this Committee of 13th September, 2021 was held as read.

 

Unless marked thus * all items stand delegated.

 

I DECLARATION OF INTEREST

 

Councillor Rome declared a non-financial interest in Article II(b) by virtue of being known to the applicant through membership of a hockey club, left the meeting for this item, and took no part in the debate.

 

Bailie Keenan declared a non-financial interest in Article II(b) by virtue of being known to the applicant through his role as a councillor.

 

II PLANNING APPLICATIONS

 

(a) 21-00338-FULL - CHANGE OF USE FROM FORMER COLLEGE TO PURPOSE BUILT STUDENT ACCOMMODATION - 30 CONSTITUTION STREET, DUNDEE - FOR JESSE STOKES SCODD LTD

 

The Committee acceded to a request for a deputation to address the Committee in support of the above application which was recommended for approval. After the deputation had stated their case and answered questions from members of the Committee, they were thanked for their attendance and withdrew.

 

Thereafter, having considered objections received, the Committee approved the application subject to the conditions recommended by the Head of Planning and Economic Development and subject to the replacement of condition 16 with the undernoted:

 

Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, a Travel Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. The Travel Plan shall clearly encourage users and residents of the site to minimise the use of the private car. Thereafter, the approved Travel Plan shall be implemented and in place prior to the development opening.

 

Reason - in the interest of ensuring that provision is made for sustainable transport measures.

 

(b) PROPOSED REAR EXTENSION, DOUBLE GARAGE AND ALTERATION OF EXISTING STONE BOUNDARY WALL - 26 WESTFIELD ROAD, BROUGHTY FERRY, DUNDEE - FOR MR JAMIE CROMAR

 

The Committee acceded to requests for deputations to address the Committee relative to objections to and in support of the above application which was recommended for approval. After the deputations had stated their cases and answered questions from members of the Committee, they were thanked for their attendance and withdrew.

 

Thereafter, the Committee agreed to defer this application to allow further consultation between the applicant and objectors.

 

III PLANNING APPEAL DECISION

 

There was submitted Agenda Note AN40-2021 which made reference to Planning Application Reference 20/00423/FULM which sought planning permission for construction of residential development (150 houses) and associated works on land to the east of Ballumbie Road, Dundee, DD4 0TG. This application by Stewart Milne Homes North and Ballumbie Investments Ltd was refused by the Planning Committee at its meeting on 17th May, 2020. The Committee refused the application on the following grounds:-

 

- the development of 150 houses on this part of allocated housing site H45 would, in conjunction with the approved development on the southern part of the wider site, result in a development of 226 houses. This is in excess of the indicative capacity of 150 houses as set out in Appendix 3 of the Dundee Local Development Plan 2019 and would result in overdevelopment that would likely lead to traffic congestion in the local area, with a detrimental effect on the capacity and safe functioning of the existing road network. This is contrary to the requirements of Criterion 4 of Policy 54 of the Dundee Local Development Plan 2019. There are no material considerations of sufficient weight that would justify approval of the application contrary to the Development Plan.

 

Planning appeal reference PPA-180-2065 was submitted and the Reporter appointed by Scottish Ministers issued a decision on 7th October, 2021. The Reporters decision was to ALLOW the appeal and GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION subject to 24 planning conditions.

 

The Reporter accepted the technical evidence contained within the Transport Assessment and noted that it had been agreed by Council transportation officers. The Reporter noted the concerns of the objectors but concluded that he could see no reason why the development would give rise to road safety concerns. He noted that one of the effects of the development would be to generate increased levels of road traffic in the local area and that increased traffic levels are an inevitable result of developing the site for housing. The Reporter noted that the capacity of the site in the local Development Plan is indicative rather than representing a cap, and neither the evidence of the objectors or the council demonstrates, in the Reporters view, that the higher number of houses proposed represents over-development of the site.

 

The Reporter also considered whether there was a case for a primary school contribution. After consideration, the Reporter did not support the Councils position that a financial contribution was required towards meeting the costs the Council has already incurred in building Ballumbie Primary School and went on to conclude that no contribution was required towards the cost of an extension to the school.

 

Claim for an Award of Expenses Decision

 

The appellant also submitted a claim against the Council for an award of its expenses in making the appeal. The Reporter found that the Council has acted in an unreasonable manner as it did not adequately support the sole reason for refusal or explain the nature of its planning grounds for doing so. In particular, the Reporter noted that there was no attempt by the Council to identify what kind of effects on the road network it was concerned about, when they would occur and what adverse impacts there would be. The Reporter found that the Council was liable for the appellants whole costs in making the appeal.

The appellant had submitted a figure of 9,500 excluding VAT as an indication of the costs incurred.

 

The full appeal and expenses decision can be accessed via the Scottish Governments Planning and Environmental Appeal Division website:

 

https://www.dpea.scotland.gov.uk/CaseDetails.aspx?id=121685

 

 

 

 

Will DAWSON, Convener.